The leadership of the All People's Congress (APC) has been spreading misinformation to some supporters and the public in an attempt to discourage APC elected representatives from participating in governance. They claim that nonparticipation will lead to a constitutional crisis, portray a one-party system, and invite sanctions and isolation from the international community. These claims are based on fake social media content and a recent press release from the Carter Center, which has been misinterpreted.
However, it is essential to clarify that without any legal challenge to the presidential election results, as outlined in the Public Elections Act (PEA-2022) and the 1991 Constitution, the election outcome is legally valid despite minor technical issues pointed out by the Carter Center.
Furthermore, there will be no constitutional crisis if the APC elected representatives choose not to take the oath of office as Members of Parliament or local council authorities. The Constitution allows Parliament to function even with vacant seats, and it has the power to regulate its procedures and operations through Standing Orders.
It is crucial to understand that political parties are not the representatives of the people; the elected candidates, nominated by the parties, are the true representatives. The Constitution allows Parliament to adapt its procedures to ensure adequate representation of the people, even including trade unions and other interest groups on the opposite side of the aisle.
Regarding the demands of the Carter Center, it is reasonable for the centre to seek transparency and accountability in the electoral process. However, only political parties, election candidates, or voters dissatisfied with the election results have the right to challenge the validity of the election through a competent court. The Carter Center, as an observer mission, lacks the authority to challenge the results or direct the Electoral Commission to take action.
To address any concerns about the election results, the APC should have followed the legal process of petitioning the Supreme Court. The Constitution and the Public Elections Act provide clear procedures for challenging election results, and only the courts have the power to instruct the Electoral Commission on such matters.
In conclusion, while there may be a threat to democracy due to elected representatives being influenced by self-seeking individuals, there is no immediate constitutional crisis. It is crucial for the APC leadership to stop spreading misleading information and follow the appropriate legal channels if they have concerns about the election results. This will help maintain the integrity of the democratic process and ensure transparency and accountability.